Jambulingam (Deceased) v. Balaguru(Decs)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 15.11.2018 Coram The Honourable Ms.Justice P.T.ASHA Rev.Appl.Nos.78 of 2015 in A.S.No.136 of 1986 & 79 of 2015 in C.R.P.No.2565 of 1985 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 in Rev.Appl.No.79 of 2015 in C.R.P.No.2565 of 1985 Rev.Appl.No.78 of 2015 in A.S.No.136 of 1986: Jambulingam (Deceased) Deviammal (deceased) W/o. late Jambulingam 1.J.Thangamani 2.K.Samadharmamani 3.M.Jeevamani (Petitioners 1 to 3 were brought on record as legal heirs of the deceased sole petitioner vide order of Court made in C.M.P.No.14847 of 1992 in A.S.No.136 of 1986)

...Petitioners

Versus

Balaguru (deceased) 1.B.Jeyalakshmi 2.B.Senthil Kumar 3.B.Sakthivel 4.Maheswari (Respondents 1 to 4 were brought on record as legal heirs of the deceased sole respondent vide order of Court dated 16.07.2014 made in C.M.P.No.636 to 638 of 2013 in A.S.No.136 of 1986)

...Respondents

(Cause Title accepted vide order of Court dated 17.04.2015 made in M.P.No.1 of 2015 in Rev.Appl.No.SR25940 of 2015)

This Review Application is filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of C.P.C against the judgment passed on 18.07.2014 in A.S.No.136 of 1986. Rev.Appl.No.79 of 2015 in C.R.P.No.2565 of 1985: Jambulingam (Deceased) Deviammal (deceased) W/o. late Jambulingam 1.J.Thangamani 2.K.Samadharmamani 3.M.Jeevamani (As for the C.R.P.No.2565 of 1985 is concerned the legal heirs of both petitioners were brought on record as per the order of this Court on 23.01.2015 while on clarification by the Registry)

...Petitioners

Versus

Balaguru (deceased) 1.B.Jeyalakshmi 2.B.Senthil Kumar 3.B.Sakthivel 4.Maheswari (As for the C.R.P.No.2565 of 1985 is concerned the legal heirs of both petitioner/respondent were brought on record as per the order of this Court on 23.01.2015 while on clarification by the Registry)

...Respondents

(Cause Title accepted vide order of Court dated 17.04.2015 made in M.P.No.1 of 2015 in Rev.Appl.No.SR25941 of 2015) This Review Application is filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of C.P.C against the judgment passed on 18.07.2014 in C.R.P.No.2565 of 1985. For Petitioners in both Rev.Appls.

:

No Appearance For Respondents in both Rev.Appls.

:

Mr.R.Vinoth Kumar for Mr.N.Manokaran

C O M M O N O R D E R When the matter came up for hearing on 26.10.2018, there was no representation for the petitioners. Hence the matter was adjourned to be posted under the caption 'For Dismissal' on 01.11.2018.

2. Even today, when the matter was called, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, these Review Applications are dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

15.11.2018 mrr Index : Yes/No

P.T.ASHA, J., mrr Rev.Appl.Nos.78 of 2015 in A.S.No.136 of 1986 & 79 of 2015 in C.R.P.No.2565 of 1985 15.11.2018