← Library
Madras High CourtHCP/2320/2017closed

D.Angala Eshwari, 27 Yrs, v. State Rep.By Its,

2018-06-22Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam,Honourable Mrs Justice S. Ramathilagam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 22.06.2018 Coram THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM & THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.RAMATHILAGAM H.C.P.No.2320 of 2017 D.Angala Eshwari Petitioner/ Wife Reticence Vs.

State Rep. by the 1.The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station St. Thomas Mount Chennai 2.The Superintendent of Police Kancheepuram District .. Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce the detenu Duraipandi, aged about 40 years, son of Arumugam before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Prabaharan For Respondent : Mr.R.Ravichandran Govt. Advocate for R1 to R3

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The relief sought for in the present Habeas Corpus Petition is for a direction to the respondents to produce the detenu Duraipandi, aged about 40 years, son of Arumugam and set him at liberty.

2.The petitioner states that she married the detenu Mr.Duraipandi on 10.10.2000 at Sivan Temple. Out of the wedlock, two male children born and the petitioner and the detenu were residing at Sivaganga District.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent police, on instruction from the respondent police, states that matrimonial disputes are pending between the petitioner and her husband Mr.Duraipandi/detenu. On account of the said matrimonial disputes, the detenu left the matrimonial home and now residing at Door No.544, Nallakulam, Vadamathur Post, Sivaganga District-630 551. On interrogation, the detenu informed the police in clear terms that he is not willing to live with the petitioner.

4. This being the facts ascertained from the detenu himself by the police and the residence of the detenu also has been identified, this Court is of an opinion that no further adjudication needs to be entertained in respect of the grounds raised in this Habeas Corpus Petition. If at all any other grievance exists for the petitioner in respect of the matrimonial issues, it is left open to her to adjudicate the same before the competent Court of law in the manner known.

5. With these observations, the present Habeas Corpus Petition stands closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station St. Thomas Mount Chennai 2.The Superintendent of Police Kancheepuram District 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

H.C.P.No.2320 of 2017 RSK(CO) GSP(22/06/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/