Sundaramoorthy, v. The Presiding Officer,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :14.11.2019

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.7011 of 2012 Sundaramoorthy

...Petitioner

..Vs..

1.The Presiding Officer, III Additional Labour Court, Chennai - 600 104.

2.The Management Espiem Plasticss Limited, No.225, Mettukuppam, Okkiam Thoraipakkam, Chennai - 600 096.

...Respondents

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the award passed by the first respondent in I.D.No.270 of 2009, dated 30.12.2011, and quash the same and consequently direct the second respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with all attendant and monetary benefits.

For Petitioner : Ms.J.Sathyavathi For Respondents: Ms.D.Veda (for second respondent) R1 : Labour Court

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent stated that the issues between the parties had already been settled.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.In view of the settlement between the parties, no further adjudication needs to be required in respect of the grounds raised in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. No costs. Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS IV ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar mrm To 1.The Presiding Officer, III Additional Labour Court, Chennai - 600 104.

+1 cc to Mr.Meenakshi sundaram Advocate sr95304 W.P.No.7011 of 2012 aa30/12/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/