Naresh Kumar v. Inspector Of Police
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(i) of IPC, in Crime No.83 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that 07.02.2023 at about 6.00 p.m., when the defacto complainant was cleaning his car in front of his shop, the petitioner was shouting, when the defacto complainant tried to talk to him, he had abused the defacto complainant with filthy language. At that time, he picked up a broken photo frame from the garbage and attacked him furiously, thereby, he caused severe injuries. Hence the complaint.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as
alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the petitioner attacked the defacto complainant and caused severe injuries. He would further submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent would submit that the petitioner was shouting and when the defacto complainant tried to talk to him, he started to abuse the defacto complainant with filthy language and attacked the defacto complainant, thereby he sustained grievous injury and he admitted in the hospital. He would further submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. He would further submit that there are two previous case against the petitioner. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Taking into account the nature of offence and the previous antecedents of the petitioner, submissions of either sides, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.
13.03.2023 jas
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
jas 13.03.2023