Anbazhagan v. K.Yasotha W/O Kesavan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 03.01.2017 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.SUNDRESH Second Appeal No.1546 of 2000 and C.M.P.No.14472 of 2000 1.Anbazhagan 2.Kangavalli ...Appellants/Plaintiffs Vs K.Yasotha

...Respondent/Defendants

Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C. against the judgment and decree dated 31.03.1999 passed in A.S.No.1 of 1998 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Salem, reversing the judgment and decree dated 28.10.1997 passed in O.S.No.438 of 1992 on the file of the II Additional District Court, Salem. For Appellants ..

Mr.M.J.Vijayaraghavan For Respondent ..

Mr.P.Jagadeesan

JUDGMENT

When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that he has got oral instructions to the effect that the appellants, being the tenants, have vacated the suit premises and handed over the possession to the respondent.

2.Learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that he has no instructions.

3.In view of the abovesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the appeal pending. Hence the second appeal is dismissed. However, liberty is given https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

to the appellants to file appropriate application or mention before the Court to restore the appeal, if so advised. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mmi To 1.The Principal District Judge, Salem.

2.The II Additional District Court, Salem.

3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

SR(CO) RS(03/03/2017) S.A.No.1546 of 2000 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/