S.Saravanan v. The State

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :20.01.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.No.33423 of 2013 S.Saravanan ..Petitioner Vs The State rep.by its 1.The Commissioner, State Information Office, Teynampet, Chennai-600 018.

2.The District Collector cum Public Information Officer, Salem District.

..Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for an issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 24.10.2013 on the file of first Respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sankara Subbu For Respondent : Mr.Niranjan Rajagopalan No.1 for M/s.G.R.Associates For Respondent No.2 : Mr.R.S.Selvam Government Advocate

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the first respondent submits that the matter has now become infructuous. Since the representation dated 24.10.2013 has already been considered subsequent to the filing of the writ petition on 29.01.2014 by passing of the final orders by the first respondent. A copy of the order dated 29.01.2014 has also been furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner, who is also satisfied with the same.

1/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the first respondent, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Commissioner, State Information Office, Teynampet, Chennai-600 018.

2.The District Collector cum Public Information Officer, Salem District.

+1 cc to M/s.G.R.Associates, Sr.No.3614 +1 cc to The Government Pleader Sr.No. 3927 AKM/26.02.2020/2P-5C / W.P.No.33423 of 2013 2/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/