Mr.Sunil Hariram v. The Commissioner Of Customs(Air)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 22.09.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Mr.Sunil Hariram ... Petitioner Vs.

The Commissioner of Customs (Air), Chennai I Commissionerate, III Floor, New Custom House, Meenambakkam, Chennai-600 027.

... Respondent PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to release the goods seizure vide Mahazar dated 26.07.2019 in terms of Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, 1962,within a reasonable time frame. For Petitioner : Mr.Sethu Prabakaran for Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan For Respondents : Mr.A.P.Srinivas Senior Standing Counsel

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous and no further 1/4

adjudication needs to be made in respect of the grounds raised in the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No Costs. 22.09.2023 Speaking (or) Non Speaking Order Index:Yes/No mka 2/4

To:

The Commissioner of Customs (Air), Chennai I Commissionerate, III Floor, New Custom House, Meenambakkam, Chennai-600 027.

3/4

MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.

mka 22.09.2023 4/4