Gabriel Udayar,S/O.Muchall v. Dhanapragasam,S/O.Sabasti Udai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 24.03.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M. SUNDAR S.A. No.1633 of 2000 Gabriel Udaiyar ... Appellant/Respondent/ Plaintiff Vs Dhanapragasam

...Respondent/Appellant/

Defendant PRAYER:- Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 29.06.2000 passed by the Subordinate Judge, Ariyalur in A.S.No.146 of 1994, setting aside the decree and judgment in O.S.No.381 of 1992 on the file of the District Munsif's Court, Jeyankondam on 29.07.1994.

For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.A. Muthukumar

J U D G M E N T

When the matter was listed yesterday (23.03.2017), there was no representation for the sole appellant.

2. Mr.A.Muthu kumar, learned counsel on record was present, on behalf of the sole respondent and he was ready to argue the matter.

3. Therefore, this court directed the second appeal to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal' today. 4.Today (24.03.2017) also, there is no representation for the sole appellant.

5. Today also, Mr.A. Muthu Kumar, learned counsel for the sole respondent, is present and he is ready to argue the matter.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

As there is no representation for the sole appellant on two consecutive days, though the matter is listed under the caption 'for dismissal' today, second appeal is dismissed for default/non-prosecution.

Sd/- Deputy Registrar (Judicial) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar To 1.The Subordinate Judge, Ariyalur.

2. The District Munsif,District Munsif's Court, Jeyankondam. S.A.No.1633 of 2000 vg1(co) ss(11/4/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/