← Library
Madras High CourtWP/9890/2018disposed of

Dr.G.Senthil Kumar, Assistant v. The State Of Tamil Nadu,

2018-06-07Honourable Mr Justice Satrughana Pujahari3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 07.06.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATRUGHANA PUJAHARI W.P.No.9890 of 2018 & WMP No.11831 of 2018 1.Dr.G.Senthil Kumar 2.Dr.V.Srinivasan 3.Dr.S.Chidambaranathan 4.Dr.M.Balasubramanian ..

Petitioners Vs 1.The State of Tamilnadu, rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Registrar, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Chidambaram - 608 002. .. Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to confer selection grade in the post of Lecturer to the petitioners with effect from July 2009 with consequential re-designation as Associate Professor with effect from July 2012 as per UGC Regulations and as per G.O.Ms.No.328, Higher Education (H1) Department dated 16.11.2017 with consequential pay fixation and arrears of salary by considering the representation submitted by the petitioners dated 16.11.2017, within a time frame as fixed by this Court.

For Petitioners : Mr.G.Sankaran For RR1 : Mr.P.Raja, GA for R1 For RR2 : Mr.P.Godson Swaminathan for M/s.Isaac Chambers

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to confer selection grade in the post of Lecturer to the petitioners with effect from July 2009 with consequential re-designation as Associate Professor with effect from July 2012 as per UGC Regulations and as per G.O.Ms.No.328, Higher Education (H1) Department dated 16.11.2017 with consequential pay fixation and arrears of salary by considering the representation submitted by the petitioners' dated 16.11.2017.

2. Heard Mr.G.Sankaran, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr.P.Raja, learned Government Advocate, who accepts notice for the first respondent and Mr.P.Godson Swaminathan for M/s.Isaac Chambers, learned counsel for the second respondent.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the limited prayer sought for by the petitioners, the present writ petition may be disposed of, at the stage of admission itself.

4. Mr.P.Raja, the learned Government Advocate has submitted that if such representation of the petitioners is pending, the same shall be considered and disposed of, within a stipulated period in accordance with law as per the direction of this Court.

5. In view of the nature of relief sought for and submissions made, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose is going to be solved by seeking response of the respondents to the writ petition by filing reply affidavit. 6.Hence, considering the above facts and the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and without going into the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of, with a direction to the second respondent to take a informed and considered decision on the representation of the petitioners' dated 16.11.2017 in accordance with law by a speaking order within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. dn Sd/- Assistant Registrar(co) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar 1.The State of Tamilnadu, rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Registrar, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Chidambaram - 608 002.

+1cc to Mr.P.Godson Swaminath, Advocate Sr.No.35783 +1cc to Government Pleader SR.No.36257 SPD(CO) sm:29.6.2018 W.P.No.9890 of 2018