Radha Naidu @ Radhakrishna v. Sri Naganathaswamy Devasthanam

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 21.03.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SUNDAR S.A.No.1835 of 2000 and CMP.Nos.8525 & 8526 of 2001 Radha Naidu @ Radhakrishna Naidu ..Appellant/1st Defendant vs.

1.Sri Naganathaswamy Devasthanam rep.by its Executive Officer Manalmedu, Mayiladuthurai Taluk.

2.Muthiah Velalar 3.Gowri Ammal 4.Padmanabha Iyengar 5.r.Santhanam Naidu 6.Krishnan Kutty Nair 7.Amsavalli 8.Muthusamy (R2 to R8 remained exparte in the Courts below. Notice may be dispensed with) ..Respondents/Defendants 2to8 Prayer : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.45 of 1999 on the file of Principal Subordinate Judge, Mayiladuthurai dated 10.02.2000 by confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.342 1978 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sirkali dated 24.12.1998.

For Appellant : No appearance For R1 : No Appearance For R2 to R8 : Ex parte

J U D G M E N T

When the matter was listed before this Court yesterday (20.03.2017), there was no representation on behalf of the sole appellant. There was no representation for the appellant in the second call also. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption "for dismissal" on 21.03.2017. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Even today, (21.03.2017), there is no representation for the appellant.

3. Therefore, second appeal is dismissed for default/nonprosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kkd To 1.The Principal Sub Judge, Mayiladuthurai.

2.The District Munsif Court, Sirkali S.A.No.1835 of 2000 and CMP.Nos.8525 & 8526 of 2001 SVI(CO) EU 18.4.17 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/