K.P.Padmanabha Kurup v. K.B.Abdul Gaffar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 03.08.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL.A.No.130 of 2010 K.P.Padmanabha Kurup ... Appellant/Complainant Vs K.B.Abdul Gaffar

...Respondent/Accused

PRAYER : This Criminal Appeal is filed under Sections 378(4) of Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the judgment of the learned XV Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai in C.C.No.5046 of 2000 dated 31.08.2005 acquitting the respondent/accused.

For Appellant : Mr.Manoj Sreevalsan For Respondent : No appearance

JUDGMENT

This Criminal Appeal has been preferred against the order dated 31.08.2005, passed by the learned XV Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai in C.C.No.5046 of 2000. 2.This appellant has set the law in motion by filing a private complaint against the respondent for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, before the Court below. After the trial, the Trial Court has acquitted the accused.

3.Having aggrieved by the said acquittal, the appellant, who is the complainant/victim of the crime, invoking section 378(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 have preferred this appeal directly to this Court.

4. This kind of appeals preferred before this Court invoking Section 378 of the Code, arising out of acquittal, directly from the Trial Court, without approaching the first Appellate/Sessions Court in view of the amendment made to Section 372 of Criminal Procedure Code, have been dealt with by this Court, in a batch of cases, in the matter of Shanmugasundaram Vs. S.Mani (2017) 3 MLJ(Crl.) 591.

5. In the said judgment, following the decision of the Full Bench of this Court dated 05.04.2016, reported in the matter of "S.Ganapathy V. N.Senthilvel(2016) 4 CTC 119: (2016)

3 MLJ (Crl) 641", this Court has directed that those appeals be transferred to the concerned Principal Sessions Courts with a further direction either to try and dispose of the appeals or to transfer the same to the Additional Sessions Courts for disposal in accordance with the provision under Section 372 of the Code.

6. In view of the said Full Bench judgment of this Court, followed by the aforesaid judgment in "Shanmugasundaram Vs. S.Mani (2017) 3 MLJ(Crl.) 591", this appeal also to be transferred to the concerned Principal District and Sessions Court for appropriate action.

7. In view of the said judgment of the Full Bench as well as the other two orders of the learned respective single Judges and the order passed in Shanmugasundaram Vs. S.Mani case (cited supra), and also in view of the submissions made by the counsel appearing for the appellant, this Court is inclined to dispose of this appeal in the following terms: (i)This criminal appeal is disposed of, along with connected original petitions and miscellaneous petitions (if any), by transferring the same to the concerned Principal Sessions Court;

(ii)On receipt of the transferred case, it is for the Sessions Court to take up and dispose the appeal or make over the same to the Additional Sessions Court for disposal, in accordance with law.

(iii)Before taking up the appeal by the Sessions Court concerned, due notices be served on both parties;

(iv)Since this appeal is pending from the year 2010 before this Court, priority can be given to this appeal for disposal, and accordingly, this appeal can be disposed of as expeditiously as possible.

8. Registry is directed to send the case bundle with all connected records of the lower Court, if any received, to the concerned Sessions Court forthwith.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar LPP

To

1. The XV Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai.

2. The Section Officer, Criminal Section (Record), High Court, Madras.

Criminal Appeal No. 130 of 2010 SR(CO) EU(24/09/2018)