O.Pannerselvam v. The State Of Tamilnadu, The Inspector Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.03.2026
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and Crl.M.P.(MD).Nos.4086 & 4087 of 2026 O.Pannerselvam
...Petitioner
Vs.
1.
State of Tamil Nadu rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Thirupullani Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.
(Crime No.57 of 2024) 2.
Mohammed Yasar Executive Magistrate, Flying Squad, B2, Ramanathapuram Assembly Constituency, Ramanathapuram.
...Respondents
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita/Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in S.T.C.No.668 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Ramanathapuram and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Ms.Rajalakshmi For Respondents : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, APP, for R1 1/5
O R D E R
This criminal original petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings pending against the petitioner in S.T.C.No.668 of 2025, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Ramanathapuram.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 04.04.2024, the petitioner, who contested as a candidate in the Parliamentary Constituency election at Ramanathapuram, along with his party members, acted in violation of the election rules, by coming in nearly eight cars and conducting an election campaign, and also violated the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act. Consequently, a case in Crime No.57 of 2024 was registered by the 1st respondent police for the offences under Section 143 IPC and Section 177 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. After completion of investigation, the final report was filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram for the aforesaid offences and the learned Magistrate took cognizance of the same and numbered it as S.T.C.No.668 of 2025, which is now sought to be quashed.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the facts of the instant case are similar to the facts of the cases in 2/5
Jeevanandham and others vs. The Inspector of Police, Velayuthampalayam Police Station, Karur District reported in (2018 2 LW (Crl) 606) and Sri Raja vs Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station Virudhunagar District and others (Crl.O.P(MD) No.7922 of 2019, decided on 30.08.2019), in which the proceedings were quashed. Hence, he prayed to quash the proceedings pending against the petitioner.
4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the 1st respondent police, on instructions from Mr.A.Kumar, Sub-Inspector of Police, Thirupullani Police Station, Ramanathapuram District, submitted that based on the complaint given by the 2nd respondent, Executive Magistrate, Flying Squad, B2, Ramanathapuram Assembly Constituency, the aforesaid case came to be registered on 04.04.2024. He further concurred with the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the facts of the instant case are akin to the facts in the aforesaid two cases.
5. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.
3/5
6. In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that the above said two decisions would apply on all fours to the present case and that no useful purpose will be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and the same is liable to be quashed.
7. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands allowed and the impugned proceedings pending against the petitioner in S.T.C.No.668 of 2025, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Ramanathapuram, is hereby quashed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
05.03.2026 (4/4) skt To:
1.
The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram.
2.
The Inspector of Police, Thirupullani Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.
3.
The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
4/5
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.
skt and Crl.M.P.(MD).Nos.4086 & 4087 of 2026 (4/4) 05.03.2026 5/5