Vijayalakshmi v. The State By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 01.04.2022 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI W.P. No.7815 of 2022 and WMP No. 7838 of 2022 Vijayalakshmi

...Petitioner

Vs.

1. The District Collector, Ranipet, Ranipet District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, The R.D.O. Office, Arakkonam, Ranipet District.

3. The Tasildhar, The Taluk Office, Arakkonam, Ranipet District.

4. The Revenue Inspector, The Taluk Office, Arakkonam, Ranipet District.

...Respondents

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the 4th respondent from the petitioner construction of house in survey No.557/A3 extent 0.00.5 cents and in survey No.557/A4 extent 0.46 cents total extent 46 1⁄2 cents at Itchiputtur, Sarasvathi Nagar, Arakkonam Taluk. For Petitioner :

Mr.C.Chokkalingam For Respondents :

Mr.P. Sathish Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed forbearing the 4th respondent from the petitioner construction of house in survey No.557/A3 extent 0.00.5 cents and in survey No.557/A4 extent 0.46 cents total extent 46 1⁄2 cents at Itchiputtur, Sarasvathi Nagar, Arakkonam Taluk.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the owner of the property comprised in survey No.557/A3 to an extent of 0.00.5 cents and in survey No. 557/4A to an extent of 0.46 cents, totally 46 1⁄2 cents situated at Itchiputtur, Saravathi Nagar, Arakkonam Taluk. The petitioner tried to construct the house. The 4th respondent, without giving any notice, stopped the construction of the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner made a representation dated 03.02.2022 before the respondents 1 to 3 with regard to the unauthorized prevention of the petitioner's construction. Even today, no order has been passed. Hence, the petitioner filed the present writ petition.

3. Though very many grounds have been raised, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would suffice if this Court issues a direction to the respondents not to interfere with his peaceful possession without following due process of law.

4. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioner will have no disturbance, as regards his possession and without following the due process of law, his possession will not be disturbed.

5. Recording the aforesaid submission, this Writ Petition is closed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

-s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar Lpp/jd

To

1. The District Collector, Ranipet, Ranipet District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, The R.D.O. Office, Arakkonam, Ranipet District.

3. The Tasildhar, The Taluk Office, Arakkonam, Ranipet District.

4. The Revenue Inspector, The Taluk Office, Arakkonam, Ranipet District.

+1cc to M/s.C.Chokkalingam, Advocate, S.R.No.22050 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.22794 W.P. No.7815 of 2022 PMK(CO) RN(26/04/2022)