N.Saroja v. Indirani

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 02.03.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM A.S.NO.469 OF 2018 AND C.M.P.NO.11968 OF 2018

1. N.Saroja

2. N.Vasu

3. N.Prabakaran

4. N.Sudhakar

5. N.Dinesh alias N.Kishore Babu

6. N.Ishwarya ... Appellants/Defendants

Versus

1. Indirani

2. Navaneetha ... Respondents/Plaintiffs PRAYER:- First Appeal filed under Section 96 read with order 41 rule 1 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree in O.S.No.198 of 2017, on the file of IV Additional District Judge, Tiruvallur @ Ponneri, dated 28.04.2018.

For appellants :

Mr.V.Lakshminarayanan For respondents :

Mr.R.Krishnaswamy

J U D G M E N T

(The Judgment of the Court was delivered by K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J) The appeal is heard through video conferencing.

2. This appeal has been preferred by the defendants in O.S.No.198 of 2017 on the file of the IV Additional District Judge, Tiruvallur @ Ponneri in a suit for recovery of possession for damages.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent Mr.R.Krishnaswamy would state that the respondents have already executed a sale deed in favour of the appellants and hence, the prayer sought for in the suit has become infructuous.

4. Recording the said submission, this appeal is dismissed as settled out of Court. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar pvs To 1.

The IV Additional District Judge, Tiruvallur @ Ponneri.

2.

The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court, Madras.

A.S.NO.469 OF 2018 EV(CO) PBS/23/03/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/