K.Lakshmanamoopanar v. Periyasami

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12.12.2017 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P. RAJAMANICKAM SA.No.672 of 2000 and CMP.No.7282 of 2000 K.Lakshmana Moopar .. Appellant/ Respt / Defenfant -Vs.- 1.Periyasami 2.Arumugam alias Attukaran 3.Chinnasami 4.Munikannu 5.Dhanalakshmi 6.Alliammal 7.Chandramathi .. Respondents Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and Decree dated 25.03.1999 made in A.S.No.4/1995 on the file of Sub-Court, Vellore, confirming the finding that the respondents are entitled to 37 cents of lands and modifying the Judgment and Decree dated 28.10.1994 made in O.S.No.332/1987 on the file of District Munsif Court, Gudiyatham, that the respondents are entitled to 15 coconut trees instead of 5 trees. For Appellant ... No Appearance For Respondents ... K.A.Ravindran

O R D E R

In the previous hearing i.e. on 08.12.2017, no representation for appellant. Hence, the matter has been posted today (12.12.2017).

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Today also no representation for appellant at the time of calling work. Hence, the matter has been passed over and taken up at 1.20 p.m. At that time also no representation for the appellant. Appellant called absent. Counsel for the respondents present.

3. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution with cost. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

sji sd/ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR [CS III] /TRUE COPY/ SUB-ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1.The Sub Court, Vellore.

2.The District Munsif Court, Gudiyatham.

3.The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

SA.No.672 of 2000 VG II[CO] MK:03/02/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/