← Library
Madras High CourtCRL MP/4294/2022dismissed

Merla Durga Prasad Chowdary v. The State Rep By

2022-04-04Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Fourth day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.4294 of 2022 IN CRL OP.25888/2021 1 MERLA DURGA PRASAD CHOWDARY [ PETITIONERS ] 2 KUMAR Vs THE STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CIVIL SUPPLY CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT, CHENNAI.

CRIME NO.299 OF 2021.

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition that the 1st petitioner shall report before the respondent police monthly twice i.e. 1st and 15th of every month at 10.30 am and the 2nd petitioner shall report before the respondent police on every Saturday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders imposed by this Hon`ble Court Crl.O.P.No.25888/2021 dated 12.01.2022. Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.R.THULASI, Advocate for the petitioner, and of MR.S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:- This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioners in Crl.O.P.No.25888 of 2021 dated 12.01.2022.

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent states that the first petitioner, who is suppose to report before the respondent police twice in a month i.e,., 1st and 15th of every month has not complied with.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.Being the person ailing from Andhra Pradesh this Court is not inclined to relax the condition in view of any co-operation. 4.As far as the 2nd petitioner is concerned, he is suppose to report before the Investigating Officer on every Saturday. 5.The leaned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent states that the presence of the 2nd petitioner once in a week is required for completion of investigation. 6.Hence, this Court finds no merit in the application for relaxation of the condition at this stage.

7.In view of the above facts, the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed.

-sd/- 04/04/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.IV, VELLORE.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VELLORE. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CIVIL SUPPLY CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT, CHENNAI.

+1 C.C. to M/S.R.THULASI Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.5145 Order in CRL MP.4294/2022 in CRL OP.25888/2021 Date :04/04/2022 From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format TA-08/04/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/