Indus Towers Limited Represented By Its Authorized Signatory Mr S Prasanna v. R Yuvaraj S O Ramasamy

Arb.Appln.No.137 of 2024 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

The learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the order passed by this Court on 24.06.2024 has been duly complied with and a sum of Rs.30,000/- has been paid as additional remuneration to the learned Advocate Commissioner by the applicant.

2. Further, she brought to the knowledge of this Court that at paragraph No.1 of the order dated 24.06.2024, it has been wrongly mentioned as "Vehicle was seized" instead of "Components of Tower were seized".

3. The above submission made by the learned counsel for the applicant is recorded. No further order is required in this application.

11.07.2024 nsa https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis