S.Ramachandran v. R.Sudhakar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated: 24.11.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Second Appeal No.1008 of 2010

1. R.Ramachandran(Deceased)

2. R.Dhanasekaran

3. R.Gopinath

4. Rajeswari Ammal

5. Vijayalakshmi Ammal

6. Kotteeswari Ammal

7. R.Pattammal

8. R.Krishnamurthy

9. R.Hari Prakash .. Appellants(Defendants 1,2,4 to 6 & LRS of D1) -Vs1. R.Sudhakar

2. R.Venkatesan .. Respondents(Plaintiffs and D3) SECOND APPEAL filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.51 of 2006 dated 17.11.2009 on the file of the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Chingleput, confirming the judgment and decree dated 30.12.2005 passed in O.S.No.40 of 2001 on the file of the District Munsif, Chingleput.

For Appellants :

No representation For Respondents No.1 : Ms.P.T.Asha for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates - - -

J U D G M E N T

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 03.11.2015, there was no representation for the appellants. However, in order to afford yet another opportunity to the appellants, the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

matter was ordered to be listed on 20.11.2015 under the caption, ''for dismissal''. Thereafter, eventhough the matter is listed today under the caption, 'for dismissal', there is no representation for the appellants. The learned Counsel for the respondents is ready to argue the matter. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. M.P.NO.1/2010 is closed.

tsi Sd/- Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar TO 1.The Additional Subordinate Judge, Chingleput. 2.The District Munsif, Chingleput.

+ 1 cc to M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates, Advocates Sr.63621. S.A.No.1008 OF 2010 KK/CO KR/8/11 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/