← Library
Madras High CourtCRP/4000/2017disposed of

Mahendran v. Ramanujam

2017-11-02Honourable Mr Justice D. Krishnakumar6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02.11.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR CRP.PD.No.4000 of 2017 and CMP.No.18707 of 2017

1. Mahendran

2. Senthil Murugan ... Petitioners Vs.

1.Ramanujam

2. Velayutham

3. Vikayalakshmi

4. Ganesan

5. Kavitha

6. Vanitha Sengodan (Died)

7. Gunasekaran

8. Prema

9. Jaikumar

10. Selvaraj

11. Vimaladevi

12. Vadivel

13. Subramani

14. Minor Mouleeswaran S/o.Subramani Minor Represent by guardian Subramani 13th Respondent

15. Muthayee

16. Muthusamy

17. Kumaresan @ Nagaraj

18. Shathi Narrayani

19. Jekatheesan

20. Nallayee

21. Gothandapani

22. Thiyagarajan

23. Kalaivani

24. Sanmugapriya

25. Nadarajah

26. Vigneswaran

27. Gunaseelan

28. Minor Ushananthini D/o.Nadarajah Minor represented by next friend/ Guardian Nadarajah

29. Minor Abiramani D/o.Nadarajah Minor represented by next friend/ Guardian Nadarajah (Respondents 15 to 29 are represented by their power of Attorney K.Kanniyappan, S/o.Late Kanthapoo, Pookkampalayam, Komaramangalam Post, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District)

30. K.Kanniyappan Jeyakarthi (Died)

31. Jayalakshmi

32. Nallammal

33. Nirmaladevi

34. Minor Lohith S/o.Late Jaikarthik, Represented by Next friend Grand Mother Nirmaladevi, Pookkampalayam, Komaramangalam Post, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District.

..

Respondents PRAYER : The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the petition & orders of the Principal District Munsif Court, Tiruchengode dated 19.07.2017 in I.A.No.23 of 2009 in OS.No.111 of 2006 For Petitioners : Mr.P.Valliappan

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has challenged the order dated 19.07.2017 in I.A.No.23 of 2009 in O.S.No.111 of 2006 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Tiruchengode, wherein the petitioners have requested for appointment of Advocate Commissioner. Further, the petitioners have filed an application in I.A.No.682 of 2017 to bring the LR's of the 28th respondent in the aforesaid suit. The learned counsel for the petitioner would fairly submit at this stage, it is sufficient to direct the court below to dispose of the I.A.No.682 of 2017 within the time frame fixed by this Court.

2. By considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitionerS, this Court is inclined to direct the court below to dispose of the

I.A.No.682 of 2017 in the aforesaid suit in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.

3. The Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with above direction. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

02.11.2017 Speaking / Non-speaking order Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No lok

To The Principal District Munsif, Tiruchegode.

D.KRISHNAKUMAR.J

lok CRP.PD.No.4000 of 2017 and CMP.No.18707 of 2017 02.11.2017