Sivakumar v. State Rep.By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Eighteenth day of March Two Thousand Twenty PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.6224 of 2020 SIVAKUMAR [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, ERODE DISTRICT.

CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2020.

For Petitioner : M/S.B.VASUDEVAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.THANKIRA, Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- When the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that petition enquiry is pending in this case.

2. The Police cannot keep the complaint at the stage of petition enquiry for long without registering a regular case.

3. Under such circumstances, the respondent police is directed to complete the enquiry within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till then, the petitioner shall not be arrested by the respondent police. The petitioner is directed to appear for enquiry on receipt of notice from the respondent police and co-operate with enquiry. It is made clear that if the petitioner fails to appear for enquiry, despite notice, it is always open to the respondent to take appropriate action in accordance with law. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The petition is closed accordingly.

-sd/- 18/03/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, ERODE DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+1 CC to M/S.B.VASUDEVAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.5359 CRL OP.6224/2020 Date :18/03/2020 TA-22/05/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/