Boopathi v. The Inspector Of Police,

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J.

The petitioner/A3 seeks anticipatory bail in Crime No.42 of 2024 registered by the respondent Police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(i) of IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002. 2.It is stated that the defacto complainant had borrowed a sum of Rs.3,000/- from Veppadai Ganapathi Finance promising to return the same within two months. But however, there was default in payment. It is also stated all the three accused had abused and had threatened the defacto complainant and intimated him. A1 and A2 had been arrested and had been granted bail. Since the borrowing is only a sum of Rs.3,000/- loan may be completely written off by Veppadai Ganapathi Finance which would indicate that the defacto complainant would not liable to pay any paisa to the Veppadai Ganapathi Finance.

3. However, taking all the other factors into consideration, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from 1/4

the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

2/4

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

14.03.2024 rjr 3/4

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J.

rjr 14.03.2024 4/4