Arumugam v. S.Palaniappan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 28.02.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI and M.P.No.1 of 2013
1. ARUMUGAM S/o Angamuthu D.No.1/100 Thottathukarar Kadu Marulayampalayam Village Salem Taluk, Salem District.
2. ARTHANARI S/o Angamuthu D.No.1/99thottathukarar Kadu Marulayampalayam Village Salem Taluk, Salem District.
3. JAGADEESAN S/o Aruugham D.No.1/100 Thottathukarar Kadu Marulayampalayam Village Salem Taluk, Salem District.
4. PONNUVEL S/o Angamuthu D.No.1/98thottathukarar Kadu Marulayampalayam Village Salem Taluk, Salem District.
5. RAJAGOPAL S/o Perumal Thottathukarar Kadu Page 1/4
Marulayampalayam Village Salem Taluk, Salem District.
6. MEENAMBAL W/o Perumal Thottathukarar Kadu Marulayampalayam Village Salem Taluk, Salem District.
..Appellants Vs.
1. S.Palaniappan S/o Shanmuga Mudali Thottathukarar Kadu Marulayampalayam Village Salem Tk And Salem ..Respondent Prayer: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 06.02.2012 made in A.S.No.90 of 2011 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Salem and reversing the judgment and decree dated 28.03.2011 made in O.S.No.626 of 2010 on the file of the IV Additional District Munsiff, Salem.
For Appellants : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.K.Dhananjayan - - - - - Page 2/4
JUDGMENT
When the matter came up for hearing on 21.02.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants and hence, the matter is listed on 28.02.2025 under the caption "for dismissal". Accordingly, the matter is listed today under the same caption.
2. Even today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, none represents the appellants. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
28.02.2025 gbi To 1.The Principal Subordinate Judge, Salem.
2.The IV Additional District Munsiff, Salem.
Page 3/4
R.KALAIMATHI, J.
gbi 28.02.2025 Page 4/4