← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/6240/2025withdrawn dismissed

Ramakrishanan v. State Rep By, Sub Inspector Of Police

2025-03-05Honourable Mr Justice Sunder Mohan6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 05.03.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN 1.Ramakrishnan

2. Mani

3. Velu ... Petitioners/A1, A2 & A5 Vs.

The State represented by, The Sub Inspector of Police, Pernambut Police Station, Vellore District.

(Crime No.29 of 2025).

... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioners on bail, in connection with the Crime No.29 of 2025, pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioners : Mr.E.Kannadasan For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 07.02.2025, seeking bail in Crime No.29 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3), 109(1) of BNS, 2023. 1/6

2. The case of the prosecution is that, due to previous enmity, petitioners along with other accused abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and also attacked with beer bottle. Hence, the case.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition in respect of the 1st & 2nd petitioners and to that effect, he had also made an endorsement in the petition. He further submitted that the 3rd petitioner/A5 is an innocent person and he has been falsely involved in this case. He further submitted that the 3rd petitioner/A5 is in custody from 07.02.2025 and further custody is not required for the purpose of investigation. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the 3rd petitioner/A5.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that, in the alleged incident defacto complainant lost his vision. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioners.

5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent Police and perused 2/6

the materials available on record.

6. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn in respect of the 1st & 2nd petitioner. Considering the nature of allegation as against 3rd petitioner/A5, period of incarceration, and since further custody is not required for the purpose of investigation, this Court is inclined to grant bail in respect of the 3rd petitioner/A5 with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the 3rd petitioner/A5 is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the 3rd petitioner/A5 shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

[c] the 3rd petitioner/A5 shall not abscond either 3/6

during investigation or trial;

[d] the 3rd petitioner/A5 shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the 3rd petitioner/A5 in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the 3rd petitioner/A5 released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

05.03.2025 Sma 4/6

To

1. Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham.

2. The Sub Inspector of Police, Pernambut Police Station, Vellore District.

3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Vellore.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

5/6

SUNDER MOHAN., J.

Sma 05.03.2025 6/6