← Library
Madras High CourtCONT P/2123/2016closed

Tamil Nadu Soft Tennis v. Mr.Sanjay Kumar

2018-02-09Honourable Mr Justice R.Subbiah3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 09.02.2018 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH Contempt Petition No.2123 of 2016 Tamil Nadu Soft Tennis Association rep. by its General Secretary M.Sembannan, Office At No.2/94, Geetha Nagar, Salem Steel Plant, Salem.

... Petitioner Vs.

1.Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Commissioner of Police, Salem City, Salem.

2.Mr.R.Mohan, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Salem West Crime, Salem City, Salem.

... Respondents Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, to punish the respondents for their willful and deliberate disobedience and noncompliance of the order dated 05.01.2016 in Crl.O.P.No.28633 of 2015. For Petitioner : Mr.G.K.Ilanthiraiyan for M/s.Sai Bharath and Ilan For Respondents : Mr.R.Ravichandran, GA (Crl Side)

ORDER

While disposing of the Criminal Original Petition in Crl.O.P.No.28633 of 2015, by order dated 05.01.2016, this Court directed the Assistant

Commissioner of Police, Salem West Crime, Salem City, Salem, (2nd respondent herein) to conduct enquiry on the complaint of the petitioner and upon enquiry, if materials are gathered indicating commission of any cognizable offence, he is directed to proceed further in accordance with law, as early as possible. If no prima facie case is made out for registering the FIR, the 2nd respondent was directed to pass an appropriate orders on the said complaint.

2.The present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the said order dated 05.01.2016 passed by this Court.

3.Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) represented that the respondents, after conducting enquiry on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, have closed the same.

4.Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this contempt Petition is closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to seek his further remedy in the manner known to law, if he so desires.

09.02.2018 Index : Yes / No Internet : yes / No ssv

R.SUBBIAH, J., ssv Cont.P.No.2123 of 2016 09.02.2018