← Library
Madras High CourtWP/8745/2025disposed of

Tvl M K Security Solutions And Electronics v. The Deputy State Tax Officer-1

2025-03-13Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy7 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 13.03.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY & W.M.P.Nos.9793 & 9796 of 2025 Tvl.MK Security Solutions and Electronics, Rep by its Proprietor, Mr.Magesh Hemnath, Shop No.G16, 16/17, Kalyan Trade Centre, Wallers Road, Mount Road, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 002 ... Petitioner Vs.

The Deputy State Tax Officer 1, Chintadripet Assessment Circle, 1st Floor, Greams Road, Annex Building, Chennai 600 006 ... Respondent Prayer:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the respondent order dated 27.08.2024 issued by the respondent in 33AKJPH0863M1Z1/2019-20, vide DRC07 Ref.No.ZD330824246074H dated 27.08.2024 and quash the same.

1/7

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Poojesh For Respondent : Ms.K.Vasanthamala, Government Advocate

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 27.08.2024 passed by the respondent.

2. Ms.K.Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of the respondent. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that all notices/communications were uploaded by the respondent under the "View Additional Notices and Orders" column in the GST common portal. Due to the health issues of the petitioner, they failed to file their reply within the time. Under these circumstances, the impugned order came to be passed by the respondent without providing any opportunity 2/7

of personal hearing to the petitioner. Hence, this petition has been filed.

4. Further, he would submit that the petitioner is willing to pay 25% of the disputed tax amount to the respondents. Hence, he requests this Court to grant an opportunity to the petitioner to present their case before the respondent by setting aside the impugned order.

5. On the other hand, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents would submit that the respondent had uploaded the notices in the GST Online Portal. But the petitioner failed to avail the said opportunity. Further, she has fairly admitted that no opportunity of personal hearing was provided to the petitioner prior to the passing of impugned order. Therefore, she requested this Court to remit the matter back to the respondent, subject to the payment of 25% of the disputed tax amount by the petitioner. 3/7

6. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondent and also perused the materials available on record.

7. In the case on hand, it is clear that no opportunity of personal hearing was provided to the petitioner prior to the passing of impugned order. Hence, this Court is of the view that the impugned order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice since it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to the petitioner to establish their case on merits.

8. Further, it was submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is willing to pay 25% of the disputed tax amount to the respondent. In such view of the matter, this Court is inclined to set aside the impugned order dated 27.08.2024 passed by the respondent. Accordingly, this Court passes the following order:- (i) The impugned order dated 27.08.2024 is set aside and the matter is remanded to the respondent for fresh consideration on condition that the petitioner 4/7

shall pay 25% of disputed tax amount to the respondent within a period of four weeks from today (13.03.2025) and the setting aside of the impugned order will take effect from the date of payment of the said amount. (ii) The petitioner shall file their reply/objection along with the required documents, if any, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

(iii) On filing of such reply/objection by the petitioner, the respondent shall consider the same and issue a 14 days clear notice, by fixing the date of personal hearing, to the petitioner and thereafter, pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible.

9. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.

13.03.2025 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No 5/7

nsa 6/7

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY.J., nsa To The Deputy State Tax Officer 1, Chintadripet Assessment Circle, 1st Floor, Greams Road, Annex Building, Chennai 600 006 & W.M.P.Nos.9793 & 9796 of 2025 13.03.2025 7/7