Madras High CourtCRL RC/65/2011dismissed as infructuous

V.Uppili Dishidar v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2016-06-30Honourable Mr Justice G. Chockalingam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30.06.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM CRL.RC.No.65 of 2011 V.Uppli Dishidar ... Petitioner/Complainant Vs.

1. State represented by Sub Inspector of Police, Vaduvoor Police Station, Mannargudi Taluk.

2. Murugaiyan

3. Sundarraman ... Respondents/Petitioner & Respondent Criminal Revision filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, praying to set aside the order passed by the learned judicial Magistrate No.1, Mannargudi dated 14.09.2010 made in Crime No.2010/2009. For Petitioner :Mr. S.Thiruvenkataswamy For Respondents :Mr.Mohammed Riyaz Government Advocate (Crl.side) (R1) R2 & R3 :Mr.S.Kingston Jerold(No Appearnace)

O R D E R

Today, when this Criminal Revision Petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the prayer sought for in this Criminal Revision Petition has become infructuous. He has also made the following endorsement.

"The above Revision become Infructuous"

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also in view of the endorsement made, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. Judicial Magistrate No.1, Mannargudi

2. The Sub Inspector of Police, Vaduvoor Police Station, Mannargudi Taluk.

3. The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras.

4. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court, Madras-104.

CRL.R.C.No.65 of 2011 msm[co] srg 21/07/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/