← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/6551/2021dismissed

Lakshmanan @ Latch v. State Rep.By

2021-04-01Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the First day of April Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.6551 of 2021 LAKSHMANAN @ LATCH [PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP.BY [RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT] THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BRAMMADESAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.45 OF 2021.

For Petitioner : M/S.V.R.APPASWAMEE Advocate For Respondent : MR.S.KARTHIKEYAN Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 379 and 430 of IPC r/w Sections 21(5) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, in Crime No.45 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that when the defacto complainant with his subordinates were conducting routine check-up, they intercepted the Tipper lorry of the petitioner and on inspection they found 2 1/2 units of river sand without any valid permit. Hence, the respondent police registered a case against the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner did not indulged in any offence. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed this petition. He submitted that the petitioner has one previous case of similar nature pending against him. He would further submit that there are every chances of the petitioner getting absconded and thereby, derailing the progress of investigation.

5. Taking into consideration the gravity of the offence and the fact that the petitioner is involved in one previous case of similar nature and having bad antecedents, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6. This Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed accordingly. -sd/- 01/04/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BRAMMADESAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.

2.THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.V.R.APPASWAMEE Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.6551/2021 Date :01/04/2021 TK/22.04.2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/