S.Syed Malik v. The District Registrar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 25.03.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH 1.S.Syed Malik 2.S.Syed Abdul Kalam Azad 3.R.N.Syed Mukram 4.R.N.Syed Akmal .... Petitioners Vs 1.The District Registrar Thiruvannamalai District.

2.The Sub Registrar Joint I, Thiruvannamalai Thiruvannamalai District.

3.Aziabee 4.Sadique Hussain G.S.

5.Ashraf Hussain G.S.

6.Thaer Hussain G.S.

7.Shamshad 8.Syed Hussain 9.Syed Geezer 10.Noorjazhan 11.Syed Hidayathullah 12.Syed Ubaidhullah 13.Syed Sujathullah 1/5

14.Fowzia 15.Nasima Fardhana 16.Ramesh ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to dispose of the petitions dated 02.12.2024 and 25.02.2025 in respect of the properties situated at Savalpoondi Village, Thiruvannamalai Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District, comprised in S.No.83/B, S.No.13/3A and S.No.2/6A and pass appropriate orders on merits after affording an opportunity to both the parties within a particular time frame to be fixed by this Court. For Petitioners : Mr.K.Venkateswaran For Respondents : Mr.U.Baranidharan Special Government Pleader for R1 & R2

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to deal with the representations /objections submitted by the petitioners dated 02.12.2024 and 25.02.2025 and to take a decision.

2. Heard Mr.K.Venkateswaran, learned counsel appearing for the 2/5

petitioners and Mr.U.Baranidharan, learned Special Government Pleader for respondents 1 and 2.

3. The learned Special Government Pleader on oral instructions submitted that the objections submitted by the petitioners will be considered as and when the document is presented for registration touching upon the subject property.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the document was in fact presented for registration and based on the objections given by the petitioners, an enquiry was conducted by the first respondent yesterday (24.03.2025).

5. In the light of the above submissions, it is made clear that as and when any document is presented for registration touching upon the subject property, the objections submitted by the petitioners shall be taken into account and a decision shall be taken. This direction will sufficiently take care of the grievance expressed by the petitioners.

3/5

6. This writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs. 25.03.2025 Index : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order ds To:

1.The District Registrar Thiruvannamalai District.

2.The Sub Registrar Joint I, Thiruvannamalai Thiruvannamalai District.

4/5

N. ANAND VENKATESH., J ds 25.03.2025 5/5