Thirunavukarasu v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Seventh day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.7630 of 2022 1 THIRUNAVUKARASU [PETITIONERS/ACCUSED] 2 SELVAM 3 ELANGOVAN Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VALATHY POLICE STATION, VILLUPURAM.

CR.NO. 99 OF 2022.

For Petitioner : M/S. S.GOWSIK SUNDAR Advocate For Respondent : MR. S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections120, 409, 419, 420 and 448 of IPC in Crime No.99 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The petitioners herein are Supervisor and Salesman of the Tasmac shop. In the course of the investigation, it is found that they have handed over the entire shop to one Sakthivel who is the third party and he was not present in the place of an occurrence. The petitioners are absconding.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. Considering the gravity of the crime committed, the facts could be brought into light, only if the petitioners are secured and taking them into custody for interrogation, therefore, this Criminal original petition is dismissed.

-sd/- 07/04/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VALATHY POLICE STATION, VILLUPURAM.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S. S.GOWSIK SUNDAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.7630/2022 Date :07/04/2022 RVR 19/04/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/