S.Murgan, v. The Secretary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 31.08.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.No.21659 of 2017 S.Murugan ... Petitioner vs.

The Secretary, The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, High Court, Chennai - 104.

... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein to consider the application dated 13.04.2017 and to allow the petitioner to enrol as an advocate. For Appellant : Mr.S.Madhusudanan

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.]

1. The learned counsel for the petitioner says that since, the petitioner has already been enrolled by the Bar Council, the captioned Writ Petition has been rendered infructuous and therefore, he has instructions to withdraw the Writ Petition. 1.1. Learned counsel has also made an endorsement to that effect on the paper book.

2. This Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. -s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar vsm https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To The Secretary, The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, High Court, Chennai - 104.

+1 CC to Mr.S.Madhusudanan, advocate sr 62781. W.P.No.21659 of 2017 SP(20/09/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/