← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/18622/2011dismissed as infructuous

Yugantar Saxena v. M/S.Redington (India) Ltd.,

2017-06-09Honourable Mr Justice M.V. Muralidaran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 09.06.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN Crl.O.P.Nos.18622 to 18625 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.1 to 1 and 2 to 2 of 2011 1.Yugantar Saxena 2.Naraianji Gopal

...Petitioners in Crl.O.P.Nos.18622 and

18623 of 2011 1.Naraianji Gopal 2.Yugantar Saxena

...Petitioners in Crl.O.P.Nos.18624 and

18625 of 2011 vs.

M/s.Redington (India) Ltd., Rep.by Mr.Sundararajan, Accounts Executive, SPL Guindy House, 95, Mount Road, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032.

...Respondent in both Crl.O.Ps

Common Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the entire records relating to the C.C.Nos.10358, 10059,10085,10269/2009 respectively, pending on the file of Learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai in so far as these petitioners are concerned and quash the same as illegal, unlawful and abuse process of law. For Petitioners in both Crl.O.Ps :

No Appearance For Respondent in both Crl.O.Ps :

Mr.V.T.Narendiran

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing the learned counsel appearing for the respondent informed this Court, that the matters were already settled before the Trial court and hence, these petitions may be dismissed as infructuous. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent, these petitions having been infructuous and thereefore, nothing survives in these petitions for further adjudication. Hence, these petitions are dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

s/d- Assistant Registrar(CCC) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To The Learned XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai.

Crl.O.P.Nos.18622 to 18625 of 2011 BR(CO) sp(17/07/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/