Mrs.K.Lakshmi Kruba, v. Mr.A.S.Ganesh Udupa

A.No.1266 of 2025 K. Lakshmi Kruba ... Applicant Vs.

A.S. Ganesh Udupa and Others ... Respondents ABDUL QUDDHOSE.J., There is no representation on the side of the applicant. The learned counsel for the first respondent is present. On the last hearing date, the learned counsel for the applicant sought time to file a better affidavit stating the reasons as to why it is necessary for the applicant to seek for extension of mandate of the arbitrator under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. She also sought time to get instructions as to whether the applicant is still interested in prosecuting this application.

2. Since there is no representation on the side of the applicant, this application is dismissed for non prosecution. No Costs. 25.06.2025 ab 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

ABDUL QUDDHOSE.J., ab A.No.1266 of 2025 25.06.2025 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis