Madras High CourtCRL OP/6512/2021closed

K.S.Amsa v. State Rep By

2021-06-17Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Seventeenth day of June Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.6512 of 2021 1 K.S.AMSA [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 S.VIJAYA 3 K.K.SUBRAMANIAM Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BANK FRAUD WING TEAM-12, CENTRAL CRIME BRANCH, VEPERY, CHENNAI-600 007.

CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2020.

For Petitioner : M/S.G.KRISHNA KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : M/S.C.E.PRATAP, Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 468 & 471 of IPC, in Crime No.237 of 2019, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that V.K.Saravanan availed housing loan for purchase of house property to the tune of Rs.7,92,000/- by submitting the fabricated documents with intention to defraud the bank and deceived public money. Further, the petitioners along with V.K.Saravanan had cheated the bank. Hence, the bank officials has given a complaint before the respondent police.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the names of the petitioners were not found in the FIR. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that it is a case of cheating. He would further submit that the petitioners along with V.K.Saravanan had cheated the bank to the tune of Rs.7,92,000/-and the custodial interrogation is very much required. He further submits that the investigation is still pending. Hence, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. .Considering the fact that the petitioners have involved in very serious offence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 17/06/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BANK FRAUD WING TEAM-12, CENTRAL CRIME BRANCH, VEPERY, CHENNAI-600 007.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.G.KRISHNA KUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.6512/2021 Date :17/06/2021 TA-14/07/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/