Madras High CourtCRL RC/900/2011dismissed for nonprosecution

Krishnan v. Visalakshmi

2017-01-31Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 31.01.2017 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Crl.R.C.No.900 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 Krishnan .. Revision Petitioner/Petitioner/ Accused

Versus

Visalakshmi .. Respondent/Respondent/Complainant Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. against the conviction passed in C.A.No.133 of 2009 dated 23.02.2010 on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Salem, confirming the conviction passed in STC.No.1256 of 2008 dated 29.10.2009 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Salem and to setaside the same.

For appellant :

No appearance For Respondent :

Mr. Abdulhadi

ORDER

When the above Criminal Revision was posted for hearing on 25.01.2016, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was directed to be posted today for dismissal. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, both the Criminal Revision is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

-s/dAssistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar mrp https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The Additional District and Sessions Judge Salem 2.The District and Sessions Judge, Salem 3.The Judicial Magistrate No.2 Salem 4.The Chief Judicial Magistrate Salem Crl.R.C. No.900 of 2011 vgl(co) aa15/02/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/