Madras High CourtCRL OP/6475/2020dismissed

Kadhiravel v. The State Rep. By

2020-03-23Honourable Mr Justice T.Raja2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Third day of March Two Thousand Twenty PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice T.RAJA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.6475 of 2020 1 KADHIRVEL [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 KOUSALYA 3 DHARMAN 4 RAMANAN 5 MATHI Vs 1 THE STATE REP. BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SIRUMUGAI POLICE STATION, COIMBATORE DISTRICT.

CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2020 For Petitioner : M/S. C.RAMKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.S.KARTHIKEYAN ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/A1-A5 who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No. not known of 2020, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to property dispute, there was a wordy quarrel between the petitioners and the defacto complainant. The petitioners abused the defacto complainant with filthy language and threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint.

3.Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the defacto complainant is none other than the father of the first petitioner. He would also submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that due to property dispute a false case has been foisted against the petitioners. Therefore, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that there are totally five accused persons. He would also submit that the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

petitioners threatened the defacto complainant with dire consequences for property dispute. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5.Taking into consideration the nature of offence committed by the petitioners and also the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, this Criminal Original petition stands dismissed.

-sd/- 23/03/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SIRUMUGAI POLICE STATION, COIMBATORE DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S. C.RAMKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.6475/2020 Date :23/03/2020 RD 28/05/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/