Naga Durga v. The State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN and CRL OP No. 22162 of 2024 Naga Durga ..Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch-1, Chennai City.

(Crime No.18 of 2024)

2. Deepa.R

3. Devi.G ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This criminal miscellaneous petition is filed under Section 483(3) of BNSS to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the respondents 2 and 3 in Crl.O.P.No.22162 of 2024 dated 12.09.2024.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.T.Balaji For Respondent(s):

Mr.P.Dhileepan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 No Appearance for R2 and R3

ORDER

This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the respondents 2 and 3 / accused in Crl.O.P.No.22162 of 2024 dated 12.09.2024 as the respondents 2 and 3 have violated the conditions stipulated by this Court in the said order.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents 2 and 3 have not complied with the conditions imposed by this Court by order dated 12.09.2024. According to the petitioner, this Court had directed the respondents 2 and 3 to pay a sum of Rs.20,00,000/- within a period of three weeks from the date of the said order. Since the respondents 2 and 3 have failed to pay the said amount within the stipulated time, the learned counsel prayed that this Court may cancel the anticipatory bail granted to them.

3. I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the first respondent and perused the materials available on record.

4. Upon perusing the order passed by this Court, it is seen that the respondents 2 and 3 were granted anticipatory bail subject to the condition that they shall pay a sum of Rs.20,00,000/- within a period of three weeks from 12.09.2024. The question of cancellation of bail would arise only after the respondents 2 and 3 are enlarged on anticipatory bail. In the present case, though such an order has been passed, the respondents 2 and 3 have not complied with the said condition and have not availed the benefit of anticipatory bail so as to warrant cancellation of the same.

5. In view of the above peculiar circumstances and considering that the respondents 2 and 3 have not violated any of the conditions imposed by this Court except not making payment, this Court is not inclined to cancel the anticipatory bail granted by this Court.

6. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed. 11-03-2026 rap To

1. The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch-1, Chennai City.

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

C.KUMARAPPAN J.

rap and CRL OP No. 22162 of 2024 11-03-2026