M/S Indusind Bank Ltd v. Dnyaneshwar Bhimrao Pandurne

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30.06.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Arb.Appln. No.429 of 2025 M/s.IndusInd Bank Ltd.

.. Applicant vs Dnyaneshwar Bhimrao Pandurne .. Respondent

ORDER

As early as on 12.03.2025 itself, this Court appointed an Advocate Commissioner to re-possess the vehicle. Sufficient opportunities have been granted for the Advocate Commissioner to execute the warrant of commission. The Advocate Commissioner has been unable to re-possess the vehicle since the vehicle could not be located. Further extensions were sought for by the learned counsel for the applicant. 2.In view of the fact that sufficient opportunities have already been granted for the Advocate Commissioner to re-possess the vehicle, no useful purpose will be served if this application is allowed to be kept pending. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.

vga 3.Accordingly, this application is closed by granting liberty to the applicant to file a fresh application seeking for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner as and when the vehicle is located. 4.While considering the fresh application, this Court shall consider retaining the very same Advocate Commissioner, who has been appointed in this application since the applicant has already paid the initial remuneration to the Advocate Commissioner.

30.06.2025 vga Arb.Appln. No.429 of 2025 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis