S.Senthil, v. The Transport Commissioner,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12.10.2020 CORAM :

The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.23273 of 2016 S.Senthil ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Transport Commissioner State Transport Authority, Chepauk, Chennai - 5.

2.The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai (North), Chennai.

... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to receive the application of the petitioner dated 26.04.2016 in Form CCPA with the prescribed fee for grant of Auto Rickshaw permit and to consider the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Govindraman For Respondents: Mr.M.Venkatesh Kumar, Government Advocate

O R D E R

Mr.S.Govindraman, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in the Writ Petition has become infructuous.

2.Mr.M.Venkatesh Kumar, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents also submitted that the prayer sought for in the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel on either side, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar va https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Page numbers

To 1.The Transport Commissioner State Transport Authority, Chepauk, Chennai - 5.

2.The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai (North), Chennai.

W.P.No.23273 of 2016 (4/14) AJS(CO) CB(09/11/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Page numbers