Karthikeyan v. State Rep By The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.03.2025 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE Mr.SUNDER MOHAN Crl.O.P.Nos 6920 and 7033 of 2025 Crl.O.P.No.6920 of 2025 Karthikeyan ... Petitioner/A1 Crl.O.P.No.7033 of 2025 1.

Vellaingiri Udhaya Chandrika Karthiga

...Petitioners/A2-A4

Vs.

1.

The State rep by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Ammapet, Salem City.

(Cr.No.59 of 2023) ...R1 Vishnupriya ...R2/De facto complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of the BNSS Act, to call for the records and to quash the final report/ charge sheet in C.C.No.13 of 2025, on the file of the learned Additional Mahila Court, Salem.

For petitioner :

Mr.T Saikrishnan for both Crl.O.Ps For R1 : Mr.S.Santhosh, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 :

Mr.N.V.Prasanna Page No.1 of 6

COMMON O R D E R In view of the commonality of the facts involved, both these Criminal Original petitions are considered and decided by this Common Order. These criminal original petitions are filed to quash the final report/ charge sheet in C.C.No.13 of 2025, on the file of the Additional Mahila Court, Salem.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the parties have arrived at a compromise and a joint memo of comprise has been entered into between both the parties, and that the final report may therefore be quashed.

The de facto complainant/ second respondent is present in person and is identified by the learned counsel for the petitioner and she produced a copy of her Aadhar Card. She confirms the fact that the parties have arrived at a compromise and entered into a joint compromise memo. A scanned copy of joint compromise memo entered into between the parties, is as follows:

Page No.2 of 6

Page No.3 of 6

4.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, and since the case arises out of a matrimonial dispute, in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, no useful purpose would be served in allowing the trial to proceed further.

Page No.4 of 6

6.

Therefore, the proceedings in C.C.No.13 of 2025, on the file of the Additional Mahila Court, Salem are quashed. 7.

In the result, these criminal original petitions are allowed. 28.03.2025 vca Internet :

Yes/No Index :

Yes/No Citation :

Yes/No Page No.5 of 6

SUNDER MOHAN,J.

Vca To:

1.

The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Ammapet, Salem City.

The Additional Mahila Court, Salem.

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

28.03.2025 Page No.6 of 6