Rajeswari, v. Rajathi,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12.11.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI and C.M.P.No.5824 of 2016 Rajeswari .. Petitioner Vs.

1.Rajathi 2.Periyasamy 3.Chinnusamy 4.Velmurugan 5.Radhakrishnan 6.Kalyani 7.Amuthavalli 8.Vennila 9.Rajalakshmi 10.Virudambal .. Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order dated 1/3

01.09.2015 passed in Transfer OP.No.82 of 2015 on the file of the Principal District Court, Salem.

For Petitioner : Mr.Mohanraju for Mr.R.Nalliyappan For Respondents : Mr.I.C.Vasudevan for R1 Mr.R.Margabandhu for R2,R4,R5 & R10 No appearance for R3

ORDER

(This matter is heard through video conferencing/Hybrid mode) Mr.Mohanraju, the learned counsel, who is representing Mr.R.Nalliyappan, the learned counsel for the petitioner on record, submitted that this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous and nothing survives in the Civil Revision Petition. 2.Recording the above submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

12.11.2021 vkr 2/3

V.M.VELUMANI, J.

vkr To The Principal District Judge, Salem.

and C.M.P.No.5824 of 2016 12.11.2021 3/3