G.E.Moorthy v. A.N.Vasudevan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.02.2019

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM S.A.No.56 of 2013 1.G.E.Moorty 2.Chandravathi .. Plaintiffs / Appellants / Appellants Vs.

1.A.N.Vasudevan 2.Lakshmi 3.Muralikrishnan 4.Kumar .. Defendants / Respondents / Respondents Prayer: The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC, against the judgment and decree of the learned II Additional Subordinate Judge, Salem, in A.S.No.62 of 2010 dated 20.12.2010 confirming the judgment and decree of the Learned Principal District Munsif, Salem, in O.S.No.645 of 2008 dated 01.03.2010. For Appellant .. M/s.J.Prithivi For Respondent .. Mr.V.Sekar

JUDGMENT

When the Second Appeal came up for hearing, learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that the subject matter of the suit has become infructuous and the counsel has also made the following endorsement to that effect:

"As per the instructions from the appellants over phone, the subject matter of the suit has become infructuous. Therefore the appeal may be dismissed as infructuous".

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellants, the Second Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar smv To

1. The II Additional Subordinate Judge, Salem.

2. The Principal District Munsif, Salem.

+1 cc to Mr.D.Shivakumaran, Advocate Sr.No.18550 S.A.No.56 of 2013 VBA(CO) CSL/25.03.2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/