P.Ramasamy Gounder v. The District Collector
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.03.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P.No. 10276 & 10277 of 2025 1.
P.RAMASAMY GOUNDER 2.
D.MURUGESAN A.KANDASAMY S.SURESH 5.
B.VASANTHAMANI 6.
C.SIVASELVARAJ 7.
P.ARUNCHALAGOUNDER 8.
S.MANIVEL REP. BY HIS FATHER AND POWER OF ATTORNEY AGENT, K.G.SELLAMUTHU 9.
T.KARUPPUSAMY 10.
K.PALANISAMY 11.
C.PERIYASAMY 12.
N.THANGAVEL 13.
P.NALLASIVAM 14.
S.KARTHIKEYAN 15.
P.PERIYASAMY 16.
C.MUTHULAKSHMI 17.
R.SUBRAMANIAM 18.
K.P.CHELLAMUTHU 19.
P.PONRAJ 20.
P.MOHANRAJ ... Petitioners Vs 1.
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT, TIRUPPUR.
2.
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DHARAPURAM REVENUE DIVISION, 1/5
TIRUPPUR DISTRICT.
THE TAHSILDAR, DHARAPURAM TALUK, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT, THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT.
5.
M/S.T.P.VARDHAMAN SURYA LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, C/O.THE TATA POWER COMPANY LTD, 34, SANT TUKARAM ROAD, CARNAC BUNDAR, MUMBAI - 400 009.
... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the first respondent in "Na.Ka.No.7500/2024/E5" dated 31.12.2024 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to follow the Procedure established by law i.e., the strict compliance of the procedure established under Sections 10 and 16 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885. For Petitioner : Mr.A.M.Natraj For R1 to R3 : Mr.R.Murthi Government Advocate For R4 : Dr.C.E.Pratap Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R5 : Mr.Abinav Parthasarathy 2/5
ORDER
This writ petition is filed to call for the records relating to the impugned order dated 31.12.2024, made in Na.Ka.No.7500/2024/E5 and to quash the same, along with the subsequent prayers.
2. When the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel taking notice on behalf of the fifth respondents submitted that this Court had already passed orders in W.P.No. 2233 of 2025 etc., whereby the very same order has been quashed and detailed directions were issued regarding the very same exercise.
3. In view thereof, nothing further remains to be decided in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs. 20.03.2025 1/2 nsl 3/5
To 1.
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT, TIRUPPUR.
2.
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DHARAPURAM REVENUE DIVISION, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT.
THE TAHSILDAR, DHARAPURAM TALUK, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT, THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT.
4/5
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
nsl 20.03.2025 1/2 5/5