N.Umathanu v. R.Priya M.Se. M.Phil

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated: 14.07.2015 Coram:

The Honourable Mr. SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, Chief Justice and The Honourable Mr. Justice T. S. SIVAGNANAM Contempt Petition No. 3315 of 2014 All Teachers Front'

rep. by its General Secretary N. Umathanu having Office at No.75, Maniam Kaliappa Street Coimbatore 641 038.

.. Petitioner vs.

Mrs. R. Priya, M.Sc., M.Phil.

DRO/Managing Director Formerly known as The Special Officer/ President, Salem Co-operative Sugar Mills Matriculation Higher Secondary Schools Mohanur, Namakkal District.

.. Respondent --- Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, praying to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order dated 28.04.2008 passed in Writ Petition No.10008 of 2004.

--- For Petitioner : Mrs. Nalini Chidambaram, Sr. Counsel for Ms. C. Uma For Respondent : Mr. Bala Ramesh Govt. Advocate.

---

O R D E R

(Made by The Hon'ble The Chief Justice ) Learned senior counsel for the petitioner states that finally, they have received the cheques, but unaware of the

break-up, which would be required to be given specifically, as tax at source had been deducted.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent states that on account of paucity of time, though receipts were issued showing the total amount of tax deducted, the break-up under different heads could not be issued. The respondent present in Court undertakes to issue the break-up to each of the persons within a maximum period of one month from today.

3. The aforesaid undertaking is taken on record.

4. In case any person is desirous of seeing the service register, the same will be shown by the concerned authorities who will make available a copy of the relevant extract of service register if sought by the parties.

5. In view of the unconditional apology tendered by the respondent (a copy of the same has been made available to us in Court, as the original is not available in the record and the learned counsel to take steps to bring the same on record), we close the proceedings and discharge the contemnor.

6. The issue of pension sought to be raised by the

learned senior counsel for the petitioner is a different issue which has a larger ramification, especially as it is an issue affecting Government Servants across the board and thus, it is open to the petitioner to take out appropriate proceedings for the same independently.

ATR SD/ DEPUTY REGISTRAR(CLAA) //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2015. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

SS/CO/20/07/2015 One CC to M/s.C.Uma, Advocate, SR.8915 One CC to Mr.R.Balaramesh, Advocate, SR.8964