Prasanth v. State Rep.By

Crl.O.P.No.13900 of 2016 S.VAIDYANATHAN, J The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 06.06.2016 for alleged offences punishable under Sections 4(1)(aaa) & 4(1-A) of Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act in Crime No.272 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 09.01.2016, the petitioner was found in possession of 110 liters of I.D.Arrack illegally.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner has involved in six previous cases.

5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also that the petitioner is involved in six previous cases, I am of the view that the petitioner is not entitled for bail. Accordingly, the criminal original petition is dismissed.

06.07.2016 kal

S.VAIDYANATHAN,J kal Crl.O.P.No.13900 of 2016 06.07.2016