Renuga, v. The District Collector,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :24.10.2018

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.5551 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 Renuga ..Petitioner vs 1.The District Collector, Villupuram District, Villupuram.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District.

3.Ramkumar .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to provide all benefits to the Boy viz. SURESH as contemplated under the Bonded Labour (Abolition) Act, 1976, considering the representation preferred by the petitioner to the 2nd respondent dated 25.02.2013 and 1st respondent dated 28.02.2013. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Nilavazhagan For Respondents : Mr.D.Raghu, GA for R1 & R2 Mr.N.Elumalai for R3

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner made a submission that the prayer in this writ petition has already became infructuous and he had also made an endorsement to that effect.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Recording the same, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS v) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kak To 1.The District Collector, Villupuram District, Villupuram.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District.

+1 CC TO GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR.NO. 73504 W.P.No.5551 of 2013 ASK(15/11/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/