Karthik v. Mari Chetti

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18.01.2024

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN S.A.No.687 of 2013 & M.P.No.1 of 2013 Karthik ... Appellant Vs.

1.Mari Chetti 2.Dhoori Chetti 3.Maheswari ... Respondents PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 12.08.2010 in A.S.No.9 of 2010 on the file of the Subordinate Judge at Mettur confirming the judgment and decree dated 21.01.2010 in O.S.No.93 of 2005 on the file of the District Munsif Court at Mettur.

For Appellant : Mr.V.Sekar For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.J.Ramakrishnan For Respondent 3 : Ms.Mahamandra Rajalakshmi 1/6

ORDER

Mr.V.Sekar, learned counsel for the Appellant states that despite intimation, his client had not contacted him.

2. Mr.J.Ramakrishnan, learned counsel for the first and second respondents represents that the matter was settled and the parties have jointly sold a portion of the property on 03.11.2020.

3. Steps having not been taken so far and since Mr.J.Ramakrishnan, learned counsel represents that the matter has been settled, the appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

18.01.2024 nl 2/6

Index : Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order 3/6

To 1.The Subordinate Judge at Mettur 2.The District Munsif Court at Mettur.

4/6

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN ,J.

nl 5/6

18.01.2024 6/6