Kumaresan v. The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATE: 02.12.2016

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN Crl.A.No.273 of 2010 Kumaresan ... Petitioner -vsThe State represented by The Inspector of Police Attur Police Station Attur.

... Respondent This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374 (2) of Criminal Procedure Code challenging the Judgment dated 28.06.2005 made in S.C.No.102 of 2003 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Salem.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Jayakumari For Respondent : Mr.P.Govindarajan Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that the accused has already undergone the sentence imposed on him and therefore, the Criminal Appeal becomes infructuous. 2.

Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Appeal is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS IV ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar Mra https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To

1. The Principal Sessions Judge Mahila Court, Salem

2. The Inspector of Police Attur Police station Attur

3. The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras

4. The Section Officer Criminal Section, High Court, Madras Crl.A.No.273 of 2010 EV (CO) kk 30/12 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/