Shankar v. State Rep.By

Crl.M.P.No.3965 of 2023 in Crl.A.SR.No.7393 of 2023 M.SUNDAR, J., and N.ANAND VENKATESH, J., [Order of the Court was made by N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.,] Captioned 'Criminal Miscellaneous Petition' ['Crl.MP' for the sake of brevity and convenience] has been filed with a 'Condonation of Delay' ['COD'] prayer.

2. Mr.R.Muniyapparaj, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice for the respondent and submits that no other separate appeal has been preferred by the appellant before us.

3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of the matter, we accept the reason for the delay, namely original copy of the judgment was misplaced by the relatives of the detenu. We also notice that the delay sought to be condoned is 315 days. Page Nos.1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.SUNDAR, J., and N.ANAND VENKATESH, J., gpa Sequitur of the narrative thus far is, delay is condoned and Crl.MP is ordered as prayed for.

(M.S.,J.) (N.A.V.,J.) 23.03.2023 gpa Crl.M.P.No.3965 of 2023 in Crl.A.SR.No.7393 of 2023 Page Nos.2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis