K.P.Vetriselvan v. The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04-06-2015 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN Criminal Original Petition No. 1732 of 2015

1. K.P. Vetriselvan

2. P. Sudharsana Swathi Selvam

3. Arul Rajan .. Petitioners

Versus

The State represented by The Inspector of Police Nungambakkam Police Station Nungambakkam Chennai .. Respondent Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest by the respondent police pending investigation in Crime No. 787 of 2014 on the file of Inspector of Police, Nungambakkam Police Staiton, Chennai. For Petitioners :

Mr. S. Paneerselvam For Respondent :

Mr. Arul Government Advocate (Crl.side)

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition was referred for mediation to Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court, Madras. 2.

A communication dated 27.04.2015 of the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court, Madras, enclosing a copy of its report dated 13.04.2015 has been received, wherein it is stated as follows:- "Both the parties appeared before the Centre along with their Counsel. Matter has been settled between them as per the terms cited in the Mediation Agreement enclosed. Hence, the matter is sent back to the Hon'ble Court."

3.

As the parties have arrived at a settlement in terms of the agreement

entered into between them, this Criminal Original Petition is listed for passing an order in terms of the settlement.

4.

The Memorandum of Compromise dated 13.04.2015 has been entered into between the first petitioner and the defacto complainant. The memorandum of compromise has been duly signed by the parties in the presence of witnesses which reads as follows:- ''1.

The defacto complainant agrees to withdraw the complaint on the file of Inspector of Police, Nungambakkam Police Station, Nungambakkam, Chennai in Crime No. 787 of 2014 against the petitiners.

The reason being the Company (M/s. Borg Energy India Private Limited, Chennai) in which the defacto complainant is working does not want to cooperate with her in the above case. 5.

Having regard to the fact that the defacto complainant has agreed for a compromise and the parties have arrived at a settlement of the dispute before the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre attached to this Court, by entering into a Memorandum of Compromise on 13.05.2015, this Court is inclined to record such compromise arrived at between the parties. Accordingly, In terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties which is recorded under the Mediation Agreement by the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court, Madras in its Report dated 13.04.2015, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of recording the said compromise. The Mediation Agreement and the report of the Mediation Centre shall form part of this order. 04-06-2015 rsh

B. RAJENDRAN, J rsh Crl.OP No. 1732 of 2015 04-06-2015