Sai Prasadh v. The State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.07.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Crl.O.P No.15781 of 2023 1.Sai Prasadh 2.Shoba Petitioners vs.
1. The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Vadapalani Police Station, T-Nagar Police District, Chennai.
2. S.Kishore Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records relating to the FIR in Crime No.112 of 2022 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Vadapalani Police Station, T-Nagar Police District, Chennai and to quash the same in respect of the petitioner is concerned.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prabakaran For Respondents : Mr.A.Damodaran Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 Mr.S.Kishore for R2
ORDER
The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.112 of 2022, pending on the file of the 1st respondent.
2. The case is still at the stage of investigation. the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves.
3. The Joint Memo of Compromise dated 22.02.2023 has been filed before this Court which have been signed by the petitioners and the 2nd respondent and also by their respective counsel. The petitioners and the second respondent were also present in person before this Court and they were identified by Mr.V.Sridhar, Sub Inspector of Police, R-8, Vadapalani Police Station. In the joint compromise memo it has been stated that the petitioner and the second respondent had entered into a compromise and amicably settled their issues in Crime No.112 of 2022. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves.
4. Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the First Information Report pending, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC 641- (Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath), and after exercising due caution as advised by the Hon'ble Suprme Court in The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Dhruv Gurjar and Another reported in (2019) 2 MLJ Crl 10, this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashes the First Information Report in Crime No.112 of 2022, on the file of the 1st respondent Police.
5. This Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a sequel, the proceedings in Crime No.112 of 2022, on the file of the 1st respondent police, is quashed and the terms of affidavit shall form part and parcel of this order. Each of the petitioners shall pay a sum of Rs.1000/- (Rupees One Thousand only) as costs, to the credit of the President, Tamil Nadu Advocates Clerk Association, Madras High Court, Chennai (Indian Bank, High Court Branch, A/c No.484026006, IFSC Code:IDIB000M157), within a period of one week from the date of
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.
ssr receipt of a copy of this order and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry. 14.07.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order ssr To
1. The Inspector of Police, Vadapalani Police Station, T-Nagar Police District, Chennai.
2. The Public Prosecutor, Puducherry.
Crl.O.P No.15781 of 2023